State Planning for Reliability and Affordability Act
This bill directs state utility regulators to review whether electric companies must secure power sources that can run continuously for at least 30 days into their 10-year plans. Qualifying power plants would have to maintain a month-long fuel supply, withstand severe weather, and support grid stability to reduce the risk of power outages. While intended to boost electric reliability, adopting these requirements could steer utility investments toward steady fuel sources like natural gas, nuclear, or coal rather than wind and solar, directly shaping household electricity costs and local energy sources.
What this bill touches.
Who it helps · who it burdens.
Who it helps
- continuous-run electric generation facilitiesFavored for long-term utility operation or power procurement agreements under the proposed planning standard if states adopt requirements prioritizing 30-day continuous generation, 30-day fuel reserves, and grid stability support.
Who it burdens
- state utility regulatory authoritiesMust initiate formal proceedings within one year and issue a final determination within two years on whether to adopt the federal reliable generation standard for each regulated utility, unless the state meets prior action exemption criteria.
- state-regulated electric utilitiesUtilities that use integrated resource planning must develop 10-year plans to maintain operations or procure power from facilities that can run continuously for at least 30 days with secured fuel, if their state regulators adopt the standard.
- Government Accountability OfficeMust evaluate past utility integrated resource planning and deliver a report to Congress within one year on power reliability, grid stability, and affordability.
The provisions, in plain language.
Show all 4 provisions
Establishes a federal standard under which state-regulated electric utilities that use long-term resource planning must adopt 10-year plans to run or buy power from facilities that can generate electricity continuously for at least 30 days, maintain a 30-day fuel supply on-site or by contract, operate during severe weather, and provide grid voltage and frequency support.
Requires state utility regulators to begin formal proceedings within one year, and make a final decision within two years, on whether to adopt the reliable generation standard for each regulated electric utility.
Exempts state utility regulators from considering the standard if the state already implemented a similar standard, held a proceeding on it, or had its state legislature vote on it within the previous three years.
Directs the Comptroller General to report to Congress within one year on how effectively past utility planning has maintained reliable power facilities and ensured affordable, reliable electric service for consumers.
Establishes a federal standard under which state-regulated electric utilities that use long-term resource planning must adopt 10-year plans to run or buy power from facilities that can generate electricity continuously for at least 30 days, maintain a 30-day fuel supply on-site or by contract, operate during severe weather, and provide grid voltage and frequency support.
Requires state utility regulators to begin formal proceedings within one year, and make a final decision within two years, on whether to adopt the reliable generation standard for each regulated electric utility.
Exempts state utility regulators from considering the standard if the state already implemented a similar standard, held a proceeding on it, or had its state legislature vote on it within the previous three years.
How your members of Congress line up
How members voted on State Planning for Reliability and Affordability Act.
Recorded roll calls on this bill, most recent first. Open one to see each member's position.
How it moved.
Show all 20 actions
- Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 218 - 207 (Roll no. 323).
- Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 218 - 207 (Roll no. 323).
- Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5789)
- POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 3628, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 936, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Moore (WV) amendment No. 1
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 3628.
- Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, H.R. 3668 and S. 1071. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, and H.R. 3628 under a structured rule; and H.R. 3668 and S. 1071 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, and H.R. 3668; and one motion to commit on S. 1071.
- Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 936. (consideration: CR H5522-5528; text: CR H5522-5523)
- Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 936 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, H.R. 3668 and S. 1071. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, and H.R. 3628 under a structured rule; and H.R. 3668 and S. 1071 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, and H.R. 3668; and one motion to commit on S. 1071.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 260.
- Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-306.
- Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 23.
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
- Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Introduced in House
- Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 218 - 207 (Roll no. 323).
- Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 218 - 207 (Roll no. 323).
- Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 936 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, H.R. 3668 and S. 1071. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, and H.R. 3628 under a structured rule; and H.R. 3668 and S. 1071 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, and H.R. 3668; and one motion to commit on S. 1071.
- Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-306.
- Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 23.
- Introduced in House
Read it for yourself.
Sources & provenance
Cite this page
Civic Herald. “State Planning for Reliability and Affordability Act (H.R. 3628, 119th Congress).” https://civicherald.app/bills/119-hr-3628. Congress.gov record as of Jul 13, 2026.