Skip to content
CIVIC HERALD
HR 6506 · 119th Congress · HouseIn committee

Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act

In plain language: Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act This bill suspends the period of time allowed for claiming a federal tax refund (limitations period) during collection due process (CDP) proceedings, prohibits the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from applying tax overpayments to a tax liability that is disputed in such proceedings, and expands the Tax Court’s jurisdiction. As background, IRS collection actions and the underlying tax liability (in some circumstances) may be disputed in a CDP hearing. Collection actions are suspended during CDP proceedings, but the IRS may apply tax overpayments from other tax years to the disputed tax liability. The Tax Court may review an appeal of a CDP hearing determination. However, the Supreme Court held in Commissioner v. Zuch that the Tax Court loses jurisdiction over a CDP appeal if the CDP hearing determination is revoked because tax overpayments are applied to and fully satisfy the tax liability. In such circumstances, the taxpayer may claim a refund and seek redress in federal district court. Currently, the limitations period to file a refund claim is not suspended during CDP proceedings. The bill suspends the limitations period for claiming a tax refund during CDP proceedings (with exceptions), prohibits the IRS from applying tax overpayments to a properly disputed tax liability during CDP proceedings (unless waived or an exception applies), expands the Tax Court's jurisdiction in CDP cases to include jurisdiction over the underlying tax liability amount (if properly disputed), and provides that the Tax Court retains its jurisdiction if the IRS abandons collection actions.

Provisional: our plain-language summary, pending review.

Provisionalunreviewed: summary
People affectednot yet estimated
Fiscal magnitudenot yet estimated
Reach
Your matchSign in →See how this matches your values.

How your members of Congress line up

Loading your members of Congress…

Timeline

How it moved.

  1. May 20, 2026Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
  2. May 19, 2026Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  3. May 19, 2026On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3564)
  4. May 19, 2026Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3564)
  5. Jan 7, 2026Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 119-428.
  6. Jan 7, 2026Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 119-428.
  7. Dec 10, 2025Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 41 - 0.
  8. Dec 9, 2025Introduced in House
  9. Dec 9, 2025Introduced in House

Sources & provenance

Congress.govrefreshed 23 days ago

Checking your session…