Skip to content
CIVIC HERALD
HR 924 · 119th Congress · HouseIn committee

NO BAN Act

In plain language: This bill prohibits the federal government from discriminating based on religion when issuing visas, admitting travelers, or granting immigration benefits. It places stricter limits on presidential authority to restrict foreign entry, requiring specific evidence of a threat, a set end date, and mandatory reports to Congress to keep any ban in effect. The bill also gives individuals and organizations in the United States the right to file federal lawsuits to challenge unlawful travel restrictions.

Provisional: our plain-language summary, pending review.

Provisionalunreviewed: impact, issue tags, provisions, stakeholders, summary
People affectedThe operative text applies broadly to future visa applicants, noncitizens seeking entry, and U.S. persons or entities affected by travel restrictions, but does not specify a quantifiable population size.
Fiscal magnitudeno CBO estimate published
Reach68provisional · pending reviewrigor: heuristic llm
Your matchSign in →See how this matches your values.

Issues

What this bill touches.

Levels of legal immigration+45Religious exemptions+45

The sign shows the bill's direction on each issue (+ toward, − away); the number is its magnitude. Color never encodes good or bad, and never party.

Who it affects

Who it helps · who it burdens.

Who it helps

  • Foreign nationals seeking U.S. entry or immigration benefitsGain explicit nondiscrimination protections based on religion across nonimmigrant visas, entry decisions, and immigration benefits, alongside a presumption in favor of family-based and humanitarian waivers if entry restrictions are enacted (Sec. 2, Sec. 3(f)(2)(D)).provisional
  • U.S.-based individuals and entities harmed by entry restrictionsGain statutory standing to bring civil lawsuits and class actions in federal district court for declaratory or injunctive relief if harmed by unlawful presidential entry restrictions (Sec. 3(f)(5)).provisional

Who it burdens

  • The President and Executive Office of the PresidentFaces strict statutory limits on entry ban authority, requiring specific credible facts, a compelling interest, narrow tailoring, prior congressional consultation, and mandatory 48-hour reporting to avoid automatic termination of the restriction (Sec. 3(f)(1)-(3)).provisional
  • Department of State and Department of Homeland SecurityRequired to meet extensive briefing, reporting, and publication mandates within 48 hours and every 30 days during an active restriction, as well as compile detailed retrospective data on past presidential travel bans within 90 days (Sec. 3(f)(3)-(4), Sec. 4).provisional
  • Commercial airlinesSubject to potential suspension of entry for their passengers if they fail to adhere to DHS regulations on fraudulent document detection and employee training (Sec. 3(f)(6)).provisional

Dollar-level funding (FEC sector totals) is coming in a later phase.

What it does

The provisions, in plain language.

  1. Expands federal immigration nondiscrimination protections to prohibit discrimination based on religion and applies these protections to nonimmigrant visas, entry into the United States, and all immigration benefit decisions.

    Sec. 2provisional
  2. Limits presidential authority to suspend or restrict foreign entry by requiring specific and credible evidence, the least restrictive means to serve a compelling interest, a specified duration, and a presumption in favor of family-based and humanitarian waivers.

    Sec. 3provisional
  3. Requires the executive branch to consult Congress before restricting foreign entry and to deliver a detailed briefing and report within 48 hours, automatically terminating the restriction if the deadline is missed.

    Sec. 3provisional
  4. Authorizes individuals and entities in the United States harmed by unlawful entry restrictions to file lawsuits and class actions in federal district court for injunctive or declaratory relief.

    Sec. 3provisional

How your members of Congress line up

Loading your members of Congress…

Timeline

How it moved.

  1. Feb 4, 2025Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
  2. Feb 4, 2025Introduced in House
  3. Feb 4, 2025Introduced in House

The original text

Read it for yourself.

Sources & provenance

Congress.govrefreshed 17 days ago

Checking your session…