Skip to content
CIVIC HERALD
SJRES 89 · 119th Congress · SenateOther

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".

In plain language: This joint resolution nullifies the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) on November 20, 2024, which amended the 2015 resource management plan (RMP) for the Buffalo Field Office in Wyoming to make no federal coal available for future leasing. Thus, the joint resolution requires the BLM to follow the 2015 RMP as it was before it was amended in 2024 and make coal available for leasing. By way of background, the BLM developed the amendment to the plan in response to Western Organization of Resource Councils v. Bureau of Land Management. In that case, the court held that the BLM must evaluate the climate impacts of federal coal leasing in the Buffalo Field Office and include alternatives to limit or stop coal leasing in the evaluation in order to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act. After conducting the evaluation, the BLM amended the RMP and made BLM-managed coal resources in the Buffalo Field Office planning area unavailable for future leasing.

Provisional: our plain-language summary, pending review.

Provisionalunreviewed: impact, issue tags, provisions, stakeholders, summary
People affectedThe text names no population. It nullifies one agency land-use decision covering a single Bureau of Land Management field office planning area and states no number of people affected.
Fiscal magnitudeno CBO estimate published
Reach45provisional · pending reviewrigor: heuristic llm
Your matchSign in →See how this matches your values.

Issues

What this bill touches.

Federal lands & resources−50Greenhouse-gas policy−35Regulation (cross-sector)−35

The sign shows the bill's direction on each issue (+ toward, − away); the number is its magnitude. Color never encodes good or bad, and never party.

Who it affects

Who it helps · who it burdens.

Who it helps

  • Coal companies that could seek new federal leases in the Buffalo Field Office planning areaWith the 2024 decision void, federal coal in that planning area is no longer closed to further leasing consideration, so acreage the decision had ruled out can again be considered for new leases (Provision 1).provisional

Who it burdens

  • The Bureau of Land ManagementIts November 20, 2024 record of decision and plan amendment lose all legal force, and it may not adopt a substantially similar decision unless Congress passes a new law (Provisions 1 and 2).provisional

Who opposes it

  • People and groups whose interest is keeping federal coal in this planning area closed to new leasing in order to hold down greenhouse-gas emissionsThe agency's own notice says the cancelled amendment reduced greenhouse-gas emissions from developing and burning federal coal in the planning area; cancelling it reverses that decision and blocks a substantially similar one without new legislation (Provisions 1 and 2).provisional

Dollar-level funding (FEC sector totals) is coming in a later phase.

What it does

The provisions, in plain language.

  1. Cancels the Bureau of Land Management's November 20, 2024 record of decision and land-use plan amendment for its Buffalo Field Office, so that decision has no legal force. That decision had made about 413,250 acres of federal coal - the acreage the agency's development-potential screen identified - unavailable for any further consideration for new coal leasing; with the decision void, the coal-leasing allocation that was in place before it applies again.

    Resolving clauseprovisional
  2. Treats that agency decision as a 'rule' that Congress can strike down under the Congressional Review Act, pointing to a Government Accountability Office opinion dated September 18, 2025. Under that Act, the agency may not put a substantially similar decision back in place unless Congress passes a new law allowing it.

    Resolving clauseprovisional

How your members of Congress line up

Loading your members of Congress…

Timeline

How it moved.

  1. Nov 20, 2025Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8395)
  2. Nov 19, 2025Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 47. Record Vote Number: 621.
  3. Oct 8, 2025Introduced in Senate

The original text

Read it for yourself.

Sources & provenance

Congress.govrefreshed 19 days ago

Checking your session…