
4th term · 7.7 years in office: 3 full terms completed, 1 in progress.
Representative · WA-8 · Democrat · since Jan 2019
Kim Schrier
Before the votes, a life.
Kimberly Merle Schrier was born in 1968 in Los Angeles, California.Source 3: Wikipedia: Kim Schrier She earned a bachelor's degree in astrophysics from the University of California, Berkeley, and a medical degree from the University of California Davis School of Medicine.Source 3: Wikipedia: Kim Schrier After completing a residency at Stanford University, she worked as a pediatrician in Oregon and Washington, joining a medical center in Issaquah in 2001.Source 3: Wikipedia: Kim Schrier
She entered politics following the 2016 elections, focusing her congressional campaign on healthcare issues.Source 3: Wikipedia: Kim Schrier Schrier won election to represent Washington's 8th congressional district in 2018 and took office the following year.Source 1: Kim Schrier — Biographical Directory of the United States CongressSource 3: Wikipedia: Kim Schrier
The path here
1968
Born in Los Angeles, California.Source 3: Wikipedia: Kim Schrier
2001
Began working as a pediatrician at Virginia Mason Medical Center in Issaquah, Washington.Source 3: Wikipedia: Kim Schrier
2018
Elected to the U.S. House of Representatives.Source 3: Wikipedia: Kim Schrier
2019-present
Serves as Representative for Washington's 8th congressional district.Source 1: Kim Schrier — Biographical Directory of the United States CongressSource 3: Wikipedia: Kim Schrier
2 sources
- Kim Schrier — Biographical Directory of the United States Congressopen source
- Wikipedia: Kim Schrieropen source archived copy
Full record card
Before Congress
- 1968 Born in Los Angeles, California.
- 2001 Began working as a pediatrician at Virginia Mason Medical Center in Issaquah, Washington.
- 2018 Elected to the U.S. House of Representatives.
- 2019-present Serves as Representative for Washington's 8th congressional district.
Stated position vs. voting record.
The dashed shape is what they campaigned on. The solid shape is how they voted. Where the shapes separate, the record differs from the platform. The distance is measured. What it means is up to you.
- Economy & taxes: not yet stated; voted 45 of 100 toward FISCAL RESTRAINT.
- Safety & enforcement: not yet stated; voted 54 of 100 toward STRICTER ENFORCEMENT.
- Immigration: not yet stated; voted 44 of 100 toward TIGHTER LIMITS.
- Rights & liberty: not yet stated; voted 53 of 100 toward INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY.
- Environment & energy: not yet stated; voted 61 of 100 toward CONSERVE & PROTECT.
- Governance & oversight: not yet stated; voted 57 of 100 toward DISCLOSURE & AUDIT.
The stats, cluster by cluster
6 clusters · 72 issues · sorted by gap size
Each rail runs between two positions real bills take. ○ marks what they campaigned on; ▪ marks how they voted. Select a cluster to open its issues.
How they voted.
- Voted NayRemoving Barriers to Work for Disabled Americans Act
- Voted YeaDirecting the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- Voted NayNational Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027
- Voted NayEstablishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2027 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2028 through 2036.
- Voted NayStop Insider Trading Act
- Voted NayContinuing Appropriations Act, 2027
Who's behind them.
How complete is this money picture?
46of the money categories we track are publicly disclosed for this member, counting those that lawfully lag.
- Campaign finance
- Corporate-PAC share
- Disclosed trades
- Lobbyist meetings
Who funds them · 2026 cycle · FEC through Jul 15, 2026
$3.0M
- PAC contributions
- Itemized individual
- Small-dollar (≤$200)
- All other