Skip to content
CIVIC HERALD

U.S. House · AZ-4

This matchup isn't final yet — primaries are still underway in this state.

An incumbent has a record; a challenger has statements. We show each what it is.

Incumbent · Has a record

Greg Stanton

Representative · AZ · Democrat

Stray indexpending review

Says vs. does — per issue

Enforcement & security
2 votesanalysis
says+80
does+58
gap +23
Firearms
1 voteanalysis
says
does+22
Farm policy & subsidies
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Sentencing & corrections
1 voteanalysis
says
does+72
Market protections
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Corporate concentration
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Drugs & enforcement
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Land use & zoning
2 votesanalysis
says
does−68
Pollution & development
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Renters & rent
2 votesanalysis
says
does+30
Greenhouse-gas policy
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Role of government
2 votesanalysis
says
does+23
Use of force
1 voteanalysis
says
does+55
Public works
4 votesanalysis
says+90
does0
gap +90
Levels of legal immigration
1 voteanalysis
says
does+35
Policing & funding
1 voteanalysis
says
does+55
LGBTQ+ policy
2 votesanalysis
says+80
does0
gap +80
Public school funding
analysis
says+85
does
Trade & tariffs
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
SNAP & nutrition
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Federal lands & resources
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Animal protection
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Substance use & mental health
3 votesanalysis
says
does+52
Election rules
analysis
says+75
does
Refugee & asylum policy
1 voteanalysis
says
does+55
Religious exemptions
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Federal vs. state/local
1 voteanalysis
says
does−45
Regulation (cross-sector)
3 votesanalysis
says
does+11
Security vs. privacy
1 voteanalysis
says
does+15
Mandates vs. liberty
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Transport priorities
analysis
says+90
does
Collective bargaining
analysis
says+80
does
Challenger · No voting record

Jerone Davison

Republican · First federal run

Stated positions

No stated positions yet

This campaign hasn't published positions we could source and verify yet — we don't fill the gap with guesses.

Stated — no voting record to compare

Money — FEC

$240.8Kraised · 2026

Challenger · No voting record

M. Zuhdi Jasser

Republican · First federal run

Stated positions

  • Spending vs. restraint · Stated

    Dr. Jasser strongly advocates for fiscal restraint, spending control, and a Balanced Budget Amendment.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Overall tax level · Stated

    Dr. Jasser supports lowering overall taxes so that taxpayers can keep more of what they earn.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Military budget · Stated

    Dr. Jasser supports increasing defense spending to restore military readiness and maintain global strength.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Vouchers & charters · Stated

    Dr. Jasser strongly supports school choice policies that empower parents and fund students directly.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Mandates vs. liberty · Stated

    Dr. Jasser opposes public health mandates, prioritizing individual liberty and personal healthcare decisions.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Regulation (cross-sector) · Stated

    Dr. Jasser favors deregulation and reducing red tape to foster economic growth.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending

Stated — no voting record to compare

Money — FEC

$564.6Kraised · 2026

Challenger · No voting record

Kai Newkirk

Democrat · First federal run

Stated positions

  • Overall tax level · Stated

    The candidate proposes raising taxes on billionaires and corporations to fund massive public programs like Medicare for All and universal childcare.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Tax distribution · Stated

    The candidate supports a wealth tax on fortunes over $50 million, higher income taxes on those earning over $1 million, and taxing capital gains at the same rate as wage income.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Business taxation · Stated

    The candidate advocates for increasing taxes on big corporations and enacting a windfall profits tax on oil profits.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Spending vs. restraint · Stated

    The candidate proposes massive public investments in healthcare, housing, education, childcare, and infrastructure.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Wage floors · Stated

    The candidate supports raising the federal minimum wage to at least $17 an hour and indexing it to inflation.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Collective bargaining · Stated

    The candidate supports passing the PRO Act and expanding protections for workers to organize unions.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending

Stated — no voting record to compare

Money — FEC

$151.1Kraised · 2026

Challenger · No voting record

Alex Nicolas Stovall

Republican · First federal run

Stated positions

No stated positions yet

This campaign hasn't published positions we could source and verify yet — we don't fill the gap with guesses.

Stated — no voting record to compare

Money — FEC

$64.9Kraised · 2026

Coverage, disclosed: the incumbent has 32 reviewed record positions to compare against; this challenger publishes 0 stated positions. We show the gap — we don’t invent density.

Provisionalunreviewed: stated positions
refreshed less than a minute ago