Skip to content
CIVIC HERALD

U.S. House · AZ-6

This matchup isn't final yet — primaries are still underway in this state.

An incumbent has a record; a challenger has statements. We show each what it is.

Incumbent · Has a record

Juan Ciscomani

Representative · AZ · Republican

Stray indexpending review

Says vs. does — per issue

Vouchers & charters
analysis
says+70
does
Enforcement & security
2 votesanalysis
says−95
does−57
gap +38
Firearms
1 voteanalysis
says
does−22
Farm policy & subsidies
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Sentencing & corrections
1 voteanalysis
says
does−72
Market protections
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Corporate concentration
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Drugs & enforcement
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Land use & zoning
1 voteanalysis
says
does−68
Spending vs. restraint
analysis
says−60
does
Pollution & development
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Renters & rent
1 voteanalysis
says
does+30
Greenhouse-gas policy
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Role of government
2 votesanalysis
says
does−23
Public works
4 votesanalysis
says
does0
Levels of legal immigration
1 voteanalysis
says
does−35
Policing & funding
1 voteanalysis
says
does−55
LGBTQ+ policy
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Trade & tariffs
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
SNAP & nutrition
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Federal lands & resources
2 votesanalysis
says+80
does0
gap +80
Government role in coverage
analysis
says−80
does
Animal protection
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Substance use & mental health
3 votesanalysis
says
does+52
Refugee & asylum policy
1 voteanalysis
says
does−55
Religious exemptions
2 votesanalysis
says
does0
Federal vs. state/local
1 voteanalysis
says
does+45
Regulation (cross-sector)
3 votesanalysis
says
does−11
Security vs. privacy
1 voteanalysis
says
does−15
Mandates vs. liberty
2 votesanalysis
says
does0

Money — FEC

$6.2Mraised · 2026

Challenger · No voting record

Trevor Dickerson

Independent · First federal run

Stated positions

No stated positions yet

This campaign hasn't published positions we could source and verify yet — we don't fill the gap with guesses.

Stated — no voting record to compare

Money — FEC

$19.4Kraised · 2026

Challenger · No voting record

Chris Donat

Democrat · First federal run

Stated positions

  • Government role in coverage · Stated

    The candidate explicitly supports enacting Medicare for All to guarantee healthcare as a right.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Land use & zoning · Stated

    The candidate advocates for cutting red tape and eliminating barriers to building more housing.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Transport priorities · Stated

    The candidate advocates for funding high-speed rail infrastructure to connect people and expand opportunity.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Workplace standards · Stated

    The candidate supports guaranteeing paid time off and exploring a shorter workweek.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending

Stated — no voting record to compare

Money — FEC

$21.1Kraised · 2026

Challenger · No voting record

Mo Goldman

Democrat · First federal run

Stated positions

No stated positions yet

This campaign hasn't published positions we could source and verify yet — we don't fill the gap with guesses.

Stated — no voting record to compare

Challenger · No voting record

Joanna Mendoza

Democrat · First federal run

Stated positions

  • Market protections · Stated

    Supports strengthening consumer protections to crack down on price gouging.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Trade & tariffs · Stated

    Opposes tariffs that increase costs for families and farmers.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Retirement programs · Stated

    Opposes cuts to Social Security and supports strengthening and increasing benefits.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Collective bargaining · Stated

    Strongly supports the right of workers to unionize.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Government role in coverage · Stated

    Supports ACA subsidies, opposes privatizing Medicare, and supports expanding Medicare coverage.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending
  • Pharmaceutical pricing · Stated

    Supports expanding the number of prescription drug prices Medicare can negotiate.

    Our analysis of their platformProvisional · review pending

Stated — no voting record to compare

Money — FEC

$7.4Mraised · 2026

Challenger · No voting record

Jereme Lance Peters

Libertarian · First federal run

Stated positions

No stated positions yet

This campaign hasn't published positions we could source and verify yet — we don't fill the gap with guesses.

Stated — no voting record to compare

Money — FEC

$10.5Kraised · 2026

Coverage, disclosed: the incumbent has 30 reviewed record positions to compare against; this challenger publishes 0 stated positions. We show the gap — we don’t invent density.

Provisionalunreviewed: stated positions
refreshed less than a minute ago